Legal Opinion · Dissent

Millman v. County of Butler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1990No. 88-314Published

1DissentFahrnbruch, J.

Contrary to the majority’s opinion, there can be no question but that a claim under the Nebraska Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act is a statutory cause of action. Under common law, the king (sovereign) could do no wrong, and therefore there was no cause of action for common-law negligence against the sovereign. See Brown v. City of Omaha, 183 Neb. 430, 160 N.W.2d 805 (1968). A county, being a political subdivision of the state, having subordinate powers of sovereignty, was not liable at common law for negligence in maintaining a public road or bridge. Stitzel v. Hitchcock County, 139…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Utsumi v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sole v. City of GenevaNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Jackson v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Stitzel v. Hitchcock CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API