Legal Opinion

Featherstone v. George R. Bidwell Cycle Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided October 1, 1892No. 5,136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Alfred Featberstone against tbe George B. Bid-well Cycle Company for infringement of reissued letters patent No. 11,153, granted March 24, 1891, to John B. Dunlop, upon the original patent issued to him September 9, 1890.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

This is a suit brought for the alleged infringement of reissued letters patent No. 11,153, for improvements in wheel tires for cycles, and in the means of securing them to wheel rims, with prayer for an injunction and an accounting. The patentee, Dunlop, originally obtained two patents in Great Britain, — the first in 1888, for a pneumatic tire; the second in 1889, for an improvement in said tire, and in the means of securing it to wheel rims. The English patent of 1889 claimed an inflated tube of India rubber, enveloped by a strengthening fold of canvas cemented to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Magowan v. New York Belting & Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. New Process Fermentation Co. v. MausSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People's Gas Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Coffield Motor Washer Co. v. A. D. Howe Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API