Maulden v. State

1. Where, to a judgment overruling his general demurrer to an indictment against him, the defendant does not preserve his exception by exceptions pendente lite or by assigning error thereon *564in the final bill of exceptions to this court, no question of the validity of that judgment may be raised in this court by argument in the brief of counsel for such defendant.

Decided February 12, 1953. Graham Glover, for plaintiff in error. Chastine Parker, Solicitor-General, Parker, Clary & Kent, John W. Davis, Solicitor-General, Robert W. Scoggins, contra.

2. Where, under an indictment in the Superior…