Legal Opinion

Perry v. . Tupper

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1874Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the hearing, the defendant's counsel moved to quash the proceedings and for a writ of restitution of the land, of which the plaintiffs had obtained possession under a writ of possession issued between the time when the appeal was prayed and the appeal bond given — the morning thereafter — on the ground of the want of jurisdiction of the Justice.

The plaintiff made no resistance to the motion to quash, which was granted by the Judge, but resisted the motion for an order for a writ of restitution, and proposed to show that plaintiff had title to the land and the defendant was a trespasser.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Gilbert v. . JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Long v. Bank of YanceyvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Pate v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. P. N. Dulin v. Walker Howard.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API