Legal Opinion
United States v. Brian Dierling
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1997No. 97-1021, 97-1023, 97-1024 and 97-1026PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Brian Dierling, Louis Younger, Arthur Holt, and Mark Perkins appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. They seek a new trial or resentencing because of claimed errors, including improper admission of evidence, a joint trial, failure of the district court 1 to provide immunity to their witnesses and of the government to furnish Brady material, and several sentencing issues. We affirm.
I
A one count indictment charged appellants with a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. Gregory Allen PeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Heath Leon Ayers, Also Known as "He-Dog," United States of America v. Roderick WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Derek BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jeremy YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Jamayal ManningsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.