Legal Opinion

Ohio Malleable Iron Co. v. Rowe

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1933No. 2297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The petition in error sets out eleven separate grounds of error, but in the oral argument and brief attention is called to only two grounds-of error, to-wit: (1) That the finding and judgment is contrary to the evidence and to the law; (2) Claimed errors in the introduction of evidence.

We have read the record very closely and think there is sufficient competent evidence to sustain the finding and verdict of the jury.

The direct cause of the death of Charles Rowe was endo-carditis, mitral lesion. We think the evidence fairly shows that Mr. Rowe had a heart affliction for…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boze v. Indust. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API