Cracraft v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentKelly, Justice
In its decision affirming the trial court, the majority purports to be doing no more than applying well-established rules of negligence law to the facts of the instant case. I respectfully disagree. A close analysis of the opinion in conjunction with a review of the applicable legal principles reveals that the majority’s opinion would salvage the last vestiges of sovereign immunity under the theory of a strict duty analysis.
The determination of whether and under what standard a city should be held liable for negligent inspection of premises under a municipal fire ordinance is a difficult…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Riss v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.