State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
West Virginia Supreme Court
Mandamus by the State, on the ' relation of the Public Service Commission, against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. _ , ., 7 ,
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge:
By mandamus relator seeks to enforce obedience by defend*401ant of its special supplemental order, of Api*il 26, 1915, requiring it to obey, comply with, and conform to the provisions of chapter 41, Acts of the Legislature of 1907, limiting railroads “in their charges for the transportation of any person with ordinary baggage, not exceeding one hundred pounds in weight, to the sum of two cents per mile, or fractional part of a mile,” etc., and prohibiting it from putting into effect its proposed increased passenger rates, fares and charges, and its proposed regulations and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Quesenberry v. EstepWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BunnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
- Picklesimer v. MorrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.