Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Dalton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1952No. 31910PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution.

In the latter part of March, 1947, the license of a tavern owned by Ernest A. Anderson was revoked by the Washington state liquor control board. Anderson subsequently consulted the defendant, John T. Dalton, a lawyer who had had considerable experience representing tavern owners before that board. In a statement made under oath August 2,1948, before a subcommittee of the legislative council of the state of Washington, Anderson said that Dalton told him, “ ‘Well, it will take $2000.00 for the Liquor Board and fifteen hundred for my attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Spokane Truck & Dray Co. v. HoeferWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kusah v. McCorkleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Browning v. Slenderella Systems of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bunch v. King County Department of Youth ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API