Legal Opinion

Stogsdill v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 9, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff was employed by the defendant railway company as a laborer at defendant's "coal chutes" at Newburg, Missouri. At these "chutes" the storage bins for coal are elevated some sixty feet, or more, above the level of the ground and the adjacent railroad tracks. Defendant's locomotive engines, engaged in both intrastate and interstate traffic, are supplied with coal at these "chutes." The coal in the storage bins is conveyed, "by gravity," from the bins to the engines through "a coal chute apron." The evidence does not disclose that it was any part of plaintiff's duties to assist in, or…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McAboy v. PackerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Sheehan v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  3. Drew v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Harris v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API