State v. Mell
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLeben, J.
I agree with the majority that (1) Officer Rick Howard did not invade the curtilage of the Mells’ home when he walked onto the side yard; (2) the warrantless search of the Mells’ home was not justified by exigent circumstances, which requires that paragraph 5 be excised from Detective Aaron Procaccini’s probable-cause affidavit; and (3) the State has waived any claim that a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies here. But I respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that the affidavit provided an insufficient basis for the issuance of a search warrant for the Mells’ home.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Barbara FamaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Darryl Glenn MalinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.