Legal Opinion

Hester v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 4, 1983No. 57654PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

Certiorari was granted in this case under Rule 3.13(A)(4), 12 O.S. 1981, Ch. 15, App. 3.

In O’Neill v. Cox, 270 P.2d 663 (Okl.1954), we held that the phrase “I hereby state and declare that I have no children and have never had any children,” found in a will, sufficiently expressed the testator’s intention to disinherit his child. In the instant case the testator included in his will the words, “I declare that I am not married and that I have no children.”

The preterminated heir statute, 84 O.S. 1981, § 132, provides:

“When any testator omits to provide in his will for any of his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Matter of Estate of SevernsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Estate of Crump v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. In Re Adams' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Matter of Estate of BovairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. ROGERS v. ESTATE OF PRATTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  3. IN RE THE ESTATE OF JAMESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Corr v. CorrCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF CHESTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API