Astruc v. Star Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
This cause comes here upon appeal from a judgment of the District Court, Southern District of New York, entered upon the verdict of a jury for six cents in favor of plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below. 195 Fed. 349.
1Opinion of the Court
RACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
This libel was considered in our opinion (193 Fed. 631, 113 C. C. A. 499, 40 L. R. A. [N. S.] 79) upon review of the first trial, when many of the questions which have been argued here were decided. The testimony was substantially the same on both trials.
The trial judge sent the case to the jury with a very careful charge, which fully' covered the whole cause and was in substantial conformity to our former decision. We think it unnecessary to discuss the case at length. The plaintiff’s contention is that, since the libel was proved to be a reckless and wanton invention…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Astruc v. Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927