MacMillan v. MacMillan

SHRUM, Judge.

In this domestic relations ease, Respondent requested a change of judge on February 18,1997, and the trial court granted that request the same day. The request for change of judge was not timely under the requirements of Rule 51.05(b).1 In addition, Respondent notified Appellant about the request for a change of judge after the trial court granted the request. Thus, Appellant was not notified in accordance with the provisions of Rule 51.05(e).

Appellant objected to the change of judge and the trial court held a hearing on that issue. After the hearing, the trial court made the…