Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 1991No. 89-1549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

2Per curiam

Although we deny appellee’s motion for rehearing, we substitute this opinion for the opinion issued January 31, 1990:

Upon the motion for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc filed by appellee, this court voted to consider the issue en banc. We have now reviewed the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in California v. Hodari, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), which we find dispositive.

Accordingly, the court voted to dis-en banc. Appellee’s motion for rehearing is denied, the order of the trial court suppressing…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BarteeSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Jablon v. JablonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. FortunatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API