State v. Arnold
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
Although we deny appellee’s motion for rehearing, we substitute this opinion for the opinion issued January 31, 1990:
Upon the motion for rehearing and motion for rehearing en banc filed by appellee, this court voted to consider the issue en banc. We have now reviewed the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in California v. Hodari, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991), which we find dispositive.
Accordingly, the court voted to dis-en banc. Appellee’s motion for rehearing is denied, the order of the trial court suppressing…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
4Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BarteeSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Jablon v. JablonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State v. FortunatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992