Legal Opinion

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

We affirm. “[T]he purpose of CPL 710.30 is to inform a defendant that the People intend to offer evidence of a statement to a public officer at trial so that a timely motion to suppress the evidence may be made” (People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 291-292 [1995]; see People v Wilhelm, 34 AD3d 40, 44 [2006]). Here, the People provided CPL 710.30 notice regarding statements made by defendant to police. At the Huntley hearing, Goff testified that when he was doing a pat-down of defendant, she made a *1178statement to him to the effect that he was inappropriately touching her. This particular statement had…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. RodneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API