Legal Opinion

Schlegel v. Bank of America, N.A.

Charlottesville County Circuit Court

Decided March 1, 2005No. Case No. (Chancery) 02-180Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Edward L. Hogshire

The pivotal issue before the Court, to be addressed herein below, are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Complainant, Kurt G. Schlegel, and Respondent, Bank of America, N.A. Complainant avers that he is entitled to judgment against the RespondentBank because the undisputed facts demonstrate that Respondent’s actions constitute conversion. Respondent asserts that it is entitled to summary judgment on the grounds that all common law claims should be dismissed as a matter of law and that the Complainant has received the sole reliefto which he is entitled under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sheerbonnet, Ltd. v. American Express Bank, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Pettus v. HendricksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Centre-Point Merchant Bank Ltd. v. American Express Bank Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Tonti v. AkbariSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Banco De La Provincia De Buenos Aires v. Baybank Boston N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API