Legal Opinion

Lanman v. Louisville Dry Goods Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 17, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 104. — ACTION BY LOUISVILLE DRY GOODS COMPANY AGAINST J. W. LANHAM AND OTHERS. Appeal from Mercer Circuit Court. M. C. Saufley, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

*799Opinion op the Court by

Judge Nunn

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. The present appellee was the appellant on the first appeal, and the judgment was reversed and remanded. In the opinion on the first appeal. (121 S. W. 1042, 135 Ky. 163), this court decided that the United States District Court could not discharge Lanman from a debt created by his fraud, and also that. it could not administer the trust created by Lanman. when he executed the mortgage to his coappellant in contemplation of insolvency and with the intention to prefer them, because more than four months had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville Dry Goods Co. v. LanmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foxwell v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Callahan v. Dine's Furniture HouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Henry Bickel Co. v. Wright's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API