Legal Opinion · Dissent

Woodward v. Ruel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1933No. 21785. Reversed and remandedPublished

1DissentJustice Stone

I do not agree with the conclusion of the foregoing opinion that the county court had jurisdiction to enter the order approving the certificate of costs and completion in this case. When the application for confirmation of the certificate of the board of local improvements was taken under advisement the judge announced that he found that the improvement did not conform to the ordinance, specifying wherein this was true, and stated that if within six months the board of local improvements and the contractor had repaired such portions of the improvement he would approve the certificate, and if…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. People Ex Rel. Modern Woodmen of America v. Circuit CourtIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People Ex Rel. Kilduff v. BrewerIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Russell v. ShurtleffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  5. City of Casey v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API