Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Stroud

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1995No. Docket 99774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Eight years after the parties were divorced, the plaintiff sought a change in his alimony obligation. The circuit court denied the motion, but the Court of Appeals reversed. Because the circuit court did not err, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the order of the circuit court.

i

The parties were married in 1957 and divorced in 1981. With the consent of the parties, the judgment contained the following provision regarding alimony:

It is further ordered and adjudged that during *544the joint lives of the parties, but only so long as the defendant shall not remarry, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Beason v. BeasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sands v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rickner v. FrederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Larry Anderson v. Mary AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Rickner v. FrederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Stephen O'Neil v. Sherry O'NeilMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Stroud v. StroudMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API