Legal Opinion
Potomac Insurance v. McIntosh
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 17, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 88-288PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The issue on appeal is whether an attorney’s professional liability insurance covers *31his action when dealing in a business context with his clients. The appeal arises from a summary judgment granted in favor of appellees on the basis that no insurance coverage existed for claims made by appellants against appellees’ insured.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Sometime during 1982-83, attorney Phillip D. White orchestrated the formation of a limited partnership known as Southwest Arizona Developers Limited Partnership (Southwest). White was the general partner and appellants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jensen v. SnellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Aragona v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Sender v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- General Accident Insurance Company v. Mary Lou Namesnik, and Robert and Cornell WhitlowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mt. Airy Insurance v. GreenbaumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Home Ins. Co. of Indiana v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Mt. Airy v. JacobCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Potomac Insurance v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990