Legal Opinion

State v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 2, 2019No. 40/18Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Harry Malik Robertson, No. 40, September Term 2018, Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – OPEN DOOR DOCTRINE – STANDARD OF REVIEW – The Court of Appeals held that the appropriate standard of review for the determination of whether a party has opened the door to otherwise inadmissible evidence is de novo because the open door doctrine is ultimately a question of law. The Court reviews the separate inquiry of whether a party’s rebuttal evidence is proportional for an abuse of discretion. CRIMINAL LAW – EVIDENCE – OPEN DOOR DOCTRINE – The Court of Appeals applied…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API