Legal Opinion

Bogert v. Southern Pac. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 2, 1917No. 253PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Suit in equity by Henry L. Bogert and others, executors, against the Southern Pacific Company. Decree for complainants, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

The history of the long struggle of the minority stockholders of the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company with the Southern Pacific Company, arising out of the financial difficulties of the railway company, down to the present suit, can be learned by reference to Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Ry. Co. (C. C.) 45 Fed. 438; Id. (C. C.) 52 Fed. 671; Id., 9 C. C. A. 687; Id., 161 U. S. 115, 16 Sup. Ct. 537, 40 L. Ed. 638; McArdell v. Olcott, 189 N. Y. 376, 82 N. E. 161; Lawrence v. Southern Pacific Co. (C. C.) 180 Fed. 822; Id., 228 U. S. 137, 33 Sup. Ct. 497, 57 L. Ed.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. Henry v. . HerringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Barnsdall v. WaltemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Liken v. ShafferDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1946
  5. Landell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API