Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Roanoke Mills Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1910PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Guión, J., March Term, 1909, of' Halifax.

1Opinion of the CourtWalkek, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover for a personal injury received by him while operating a machine known as the “picker,” in the cotton mill of the defendant. The machine had two lids, which were near each other; the smaller one covered the feed rolls and the larger one the “beater.” The plaintiff was hurt while raising the lid for the “beater,” by being caught in the machinery. Sometimes the machine is choked with cotton, but this occurs in the feed rolls, which are covered by the smaller lid, and never in the “beater,” which is covered by the larger lid. The plaintiff was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Whitson v. Wrenn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Nathan v. Charlotte Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Baker v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Patterson v. North Carolina Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Simmons v. FishMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. State v. AllisonMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Welch Ex Rel. Johnson v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Brackman Ex Rel. Schaub v. BrackmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API