Legal Opinion
Spiegelberg v. Gomez
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1978PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. Petitioners are residential tenants of premises which have been condemned by the city under exercise of the power of eminent domain on various dates between 1963 and 1970. Due to well-publicized and acknowledged city fiscal difficulties the properties have not been developed as originally planned but have remained residential under the control and maintenance of the city. The tenants’ rent has remained unchanged since title vesting, in some cases as long as 14 years and since the rents are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Abood v. Hospital Ambulance Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Johanns v. . FickeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by49 opinions
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Maglich v. Saxe, Bacon & Bolan, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Banco do Estado de Sao Paulo S.A. v. Mendes Junior International Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- New York State Ass'n of Criminal Defense Lawyers v. KayeNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Plymouth Rock Fuel Corp. v. Leucadia, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.