Steinpreis v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
We repeat here something of what was said, and decided, a few months ago, in Steinpreis v. Leet, 240 Md. 212, 213 A. 2d 555 (1965). The appellant is the same (Steinpreis), the complaint is the same (want of jurisdiction in the People’s Court of Montgomery County), and the subject matter is the same (appellant’s apparent lack of enthusiasm for the payment of rent). Chief Judge Prescott, in Leet supra, began the Court’s opinion by saying:
“This appeal gives us little difficulty in its decision. Our main difficulty has been to attempt to unravel the pertinent issue or issues for determination…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCormick v. St. Francis De Sales ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Keen v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
- Beckwith v. Kansas City & Olathe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Alcarese v. StingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Maryland Securities CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Steinpreis v. ShookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Steinpreis v. ShookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Maryhew v. YovaOhio Supreme Court · 1984