Legal Opinion · Dissent

Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 3, 2007Published

1DissentMcGuire, J.

I respectfully dissent. In this action brought by former clients of the defendant law firm for legal malpractice, plaintiffs allege that defendant negligently provided erroneous advice concerning the legality under Russian law of a particular vehicle for investment in certain Russian securities (the SP Structure), and that plaintiffs relied on that advice and suffered damages as a result of their reliance. As plaintiffs have never disputed, by commencing this action they waived the attorney-client privilege with re*202spect to the SP Structure (Jakobleff v Cerrato, Sweeney & Cohn, 97 AD2d 834,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Orco Bank v. PacificoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. DeBartolo v. CocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Stark v. Greenberg, Dauber & EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API