The People v. Todd Holley
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 196 The People &c., Respondent, v. Todd Holley, Appellant. Andrew C. Fine, for appellant. Joshua L. Haber, for respondent. FAHEY, J.: When using a photo array as an identification procedure, the People should preserve a record of what was viewed. Failure to do so gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the array was unduly suggestive. The obligation to preserve is not diminished by the type of system used. Computer screen or…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.