Legal Opinion

The People v. Todd Holley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2015No. 196Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 196 The People &c., Respondent, v. Todd Holley, Appellant. Andrew C. Fine, for appellant. Joshua L. Haber, for respondent. FAHEY, J.: When using a photo array as an identification procedure, the People should preserve a record of what was viewed. Failure to do so gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the array was unduly suggestive. The obligation to preserve is not diminished by the type of system used. Computer screen or…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API