Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Hill County

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1924No. 63PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

The appellant, J. E. McKenzie, was the duly elected, qualified, and acting tax collector of Hill county from November 30, 1912, to November 30, 1916, having been re-elected in 1914. On August 13, 1921, appellee, Hill county, filed this suit against appellant J. E. McKenzie and his bondsmen for what it claims to be fees retained by J. E. McKenzie, tax collector, during his term of office and for additional fees paid to McKenzie by his successor in office after he, McKenzie, went out of office; appellee contending that the office of tax collector during said years under the fee bill paid more…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jeff Davis County v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. Travis CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hillman v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Johnson v. Llano CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. City of Chicago v. Dunham Towing & Wrecking Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gulf Bitulithic Co. v. Nueces CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. State v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Steusoff v. Liberty CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Hemphill County v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API