Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 28, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge MoCandless

Affirming.

Gr. E. Bell and wife and infant child, were riding in an open-top buggy over the tracks of the C., N. O. & T. P. R. R. Co., at Columbia crossing in the city of Somerset. "While so doing the mule drawing the vehicle became frightened by the movement of a motor velocipede on the railway tracks and ran away, throwing the occupants from the buggy. Bell received serious injuries, for which he recovered in this action the sum of $3,450.00 against the C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. and Dallas Bradshaw, the operator of the velocipede. Both defendants appeal.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Hudson v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  3. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HowertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API