Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1999No. 99-1162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Given respondent’s restitution, remorse, and ultimate cooperation in the proceedings, a definite suspension from the practice of law is an appropriate sanction for his misconduct. See Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 185, 580 N.E.2d 1076. Respondent is hereby suspended from the *150practice of law in Ohio for one year, with six months stayed on the condition that during the first six months of the suspension, he take six hours of continuing legal education courses in law office management. Costs taxed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. CaywoodOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. NigolianOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. NigolianOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TreneffOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. LawrenceOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. NigolianOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API