Commonwealth v. Willard
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
This appeal involves, inter alia, the question whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the defendant-appellant’s conviction of an attempt to commit abortion. In brief the issue is whether the acts committed by the appellant constituted an attempt within the meaning of the law or were merely preparatory to the commission of a crime. Since in our opinion the acts of the appellant did not constitute an attempt, it follows that the evidence was insufficient to sustain her conviction. Consequently, it will not be.necessary to discuss or decide the other contentions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. SierakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. LongwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Commonwealth v. KelleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ZingarelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BerkerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- People v. SchmidtCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
- Commonwealth v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.