Pinney v. Smith
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. O. M. Tobbison, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
J. A. Smith, plaintiff below, recovered a judgment against Carl B. Pinney, defendant below, for the sum of $375 and costs, to reverse which this writ of error was sued out. The plaintiff’s bill of particulars is, in substance, that he and the defendant were partners in the photographers’ supply business from December 1, 1905, until July 25, 1906, and that, at the latter date, plaintiff withdrew from the partnership and sold his interest as partner to the defendant for $400, which sum the defendant agreed and promised to pay, but has thus far failed so to do, and plaintiff claims $400, with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Horner v. StarkeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Fisk v. HoppingIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hubbard v. LogsdonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Katt v. Estate of ChapmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Folkerts v. ShieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Buchholz v. FeustelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913