Legal Opinion

Everette v. Mahaffey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1952No. 17766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. In an equity case such as this, in which the plaintiff seeks to impress upon described property an implied resulting trust because of the alleged payment by the plaintiff of the purchase price of the property and the placing of the title thereto in one of the defendants, and to enjoin the cutting of timber thereon by the defendants, the presiding judge may in his discretion submit special issues of fact to the jury, under the Code, § 37-1104, without the request of either party. Hardin v. Foster, 102 Ga. 180 (29 S. E. 174); McWhorter v. Ford, 142 Ga. 554 (5) (83 S. E. 134).

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. McWhorter v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Jefferson v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Hardin v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. F. A. F. Motor Cars, Inc. v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Car-Perk Services, Inc. v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Bowman v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API