Legal Opinion

Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling Mills v. Ledwidge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. This is a bill filed in the Superior Court of Cook county by the Detroit Copper and Brass Rolling Mills, a body corporate, against Matthew Ledwidge, doing business under the firm name of Ledwidge & Co., Harry Bennett, certain judgment creditors of said Ledwidge, and James Pease, sheriff of Cook county.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. This is a bill filed in the Superior Court of Cook county by the Detroit Copper and Brass Rolling Mills, a body corporate, against Matthew Ledwidge, doing business under the firm name of Ledwidge & Co., Harry Bennett, certain judgment creditors of said Ledwidge, and James Pease, sheriff of Cook county. A general demurrer was filed to the bill, which was sustained by the court below. The complainant took exceptions to the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

The creditor filing the bill in this case is a mere contract creditor, who has not reduced his claim to judgment. The bill alleges, it is true, that, before the filing of it, complainant had commenced an attachment suit upon its claim, and caused an attachment writ therein issued to be levied by the sheriff upon a stock of merchandise, belonging to the debtor, worth about $15,000.00, subject, however, to the executions of certain judgment creditors, holding judgments to the amount of about $24,000.00. The bill shows, that the sheriff had seized the stock under the executions before the levy…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bigelow v. AndressIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Gore v. KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Greenway v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Shufeldt v. BoehmIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moore v. BackusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  2. Fisher v. Hamilton (In Re Teknek, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Buckley v. MaupinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Hart v. OliverIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ayres v. Graham Steamship Coal & Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API