Legal Opinion

WOODROW PAIR v. Blakly

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 31, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

160 N.J. Super. 14 (1978)

388 A.2d 1026

WOODROW PAIR ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ALVIN BLAKLY ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND GEORGE E. SHAW ET UX., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

GEORGE KRUG, ETC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted February 6, 1978.

Decided May 31, 1978.

Before Judges FRITZ, BOTTER and ARD.

Messrs. Sutton, Ward, Sutton, Heim & O'Malley, attorneys for appellants.

Messrs. Lomell, Muccifori, Adler, Kearney, Ravaschiere & Amabile, attorneys for respondent (Mr. Dominic Ravaschiere on the brief).

The opinion of the court was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  3. Stoelting v. HauckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Brody v. Albert Lifson & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Ambrose v. CyphersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MielesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Palmisano v. EhrigNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API