Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hart v. Gleeson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1937No. 26355. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county wherein a peremptory writ of mandate was granted directing the county and its board of commissioners forth •with to investigate relator’s application for relief to the blind and to issue and deliver to him warrants upon the county treasury for the amount of relief found to be due, according to law.

The application upon which this proceeding is brought sets forth facts showing that the respondent relator is a blind person within the meaning, and entitled to the benefits, of chapter 106, Laws of 1935, p. 259, Eem.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newman v. SchlarbWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Robbins v. ScofieldWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conant v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. WeirMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Boyle v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Dept. F.B. B. v. Thurston Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hart v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API