Legal Opinion

Yates v. Yates

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1916No. 8236PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; Leander G. Pitman, judge. Action by Georgia Bell Yates against J. AY. Mates. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEAYS, C.

This was an action for divorce and alimony. Upon the trial being had, the court refused plaintiff’s prayer for a divorce, but granted a divorce to defendant upon his cross-petition. The court also allowed plaintiff alimony in the sum of $500, and the further sum of $15.0 for her attorney, and provided that the amount theretofore allowed for temporary alimony be deducted from the amount therein .allowed, and that the balance be paid to-the clerk for the use and benefit of the plaintiff. The plaintiff took an appeal from the overruling of her motion for a new trial, and…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gerbig v. GerbigNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Harris v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
  3. Fletcher v. PopejoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Mosier v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Davis v. FlintSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API