Claude Henninger Company v. Bentley
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pbewitt
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case and the Chancellor held that the petitioner, Curtis Bentley, has a permanent partial disability of 75% to the body as a whole, and that he have and recover of the Claude Henninger Company, Workmen’s Compensation at the rate of $30 per week for a period of 300 weeks as provided by statute.
The proof shows that complainant was injured as a result of a plank slipping from a scaffold and throwing the petitioner onto a concrete floor and in so doing his left foot and Iteel were broken and mangled, and that it was necessary for the petitioner to receive medical…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Russell v. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
- M. B. McMahan Lumber Co. v. OwnbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Tibbals Flooring Co. v. BrewsterTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Hix v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Riley v. Aetna Casualty & SuretyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. TownsendTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.