Legal Opinion

Claude Henninger Company v. Bentley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pbewitt

This is a Workmen’s Compensation case and the Chancellor held that the petitioner, Curtis Bentley, has a permanent partial disability of 75% to the body as a whole, and that he have and recover of the Claude Henninger Company, Workmen’s Compensation at the rate of $30 per week for a period of 300 weeks as provided by statute.

The proof shows that complainant was injured as a result of a plank slipping from a scaffold and throwing the petitioner onto a concrete floor and in so doing his left foot and Iteel were broken and mangled, and that it was necessary for the petitioner to receive medical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Russell v. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. M. B. McMahan Lumber Co. v. OwnbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Tibbals Flooring Co. v. BrewsterTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. Campbell and Dann Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hix v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Riley v. Aetna Casualty & SuretyTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. TownsendTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API