Drury v. Hartigan
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The plaintiff is the father of the defendant. In his bill the plaintiff alleges that he gave the defendant three promissory notes, (1) a note dated January 25, 1932, for $2,000, (2) a note dated May 9, 1932, for $273.04, and (3) a note dated April 22, 1941, for $15,000. All three notes appear from copies incorporated in the bill to have been payable on demand, and the first two appear to have been sealed instruments. There are allegations that all the notes were given without consideration for the accom*176modation of the defendant; that the defendant has demanded payment of them; that if the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kidder v. GreenmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Blair's Foodland Inc. v. Shuman's Foodland, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Pickard v. ClancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Clarke v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Hooker v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McOuatt v. McOuattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Associated Perfumers, Inc. v. AndelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Staples Coal Co. v. City Fuel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Medlinsky v. Premium Cut Beef Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Bridge Enterprises, Inc. v. Futurity Thread Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.