Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Pedro Z.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 2010No. B223478PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, P. J.

Presumed father Pedro Z., Sr. (Father), who was incarcerated throughout these proceedings, appeals from an order denying him *16family reunification services with his son, Pedro Z., Jr., bom in 2002, after the juvenile court asserted dependency jurisdiction pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b) (failure to protect) and placed Pedro with his mother, Norma D. (Mother), under the supervision of the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS).1

Father claims he was entitled to reunification services under section 361.5 as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Epifania B.California Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Sergio D. (In re Destiny D.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. A.R. (In re N.O.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. C.M. (In re A.M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Govindarajan v. Government Employee Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. In re A.C.C. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API