Legal Opinion

Schlacks v. Johnson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1899No. 1560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Eistriet Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

The only error assigned to this decree is predicated on the form of the summons and the proof of service whereon it was entered.

The principal argument rests on the motion filed to quash the summons and the affidavit attached whereby it was supported. As we look at it neither the motion nor the affidavit are before us. This question has been entirely settled by the supreme court and it is not debatable. There is no bill of exceptions in the record nor was any exception saved to the judgment or to the order denying the motion, and without some evidence thus preserved we are not at liberty to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rutter v. ShumwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Jordan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Rooks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Smurr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Moore v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kavanagh v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. GregerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Clark v. National Adjusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API