Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Harrison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 21, 1897No. Nos. 10,623—(236)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In the probate court for St. Louis county, Lucy Gray Harrison, executrix, obtained a license to sell land belonging to her testator. Louise Henry Harrison, an infant, by Henry S. Mahon, guardian ad litem, appealed to the district court for that county. From a judgment of the district court, entered pursuant to the order of Cant, J., affirming the order of the probate court, she appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

G. S. 1894, § 4598, provides:'

“After an order of sale is made and said bond filed with the court, the executor, administrator or guardian shall thereupon be authorized to *521sell the real estate as therein described, within one year after the making of such order, or within such further time, not exceeding two years, as may be allowed by said court.”

Under the provisions of this section, Lucy G-. Harrison, as executrix of the estate of Matthew B. Harrison, deceased, was on September 10, 1892, duly licensed by the probate court of St. Louis county to sell the real estate left by said deceased for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gates v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. In re the Estate of AckermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fiske v. LawtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. In Re Guardianship of StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Abrahamson v. StromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API