Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 1936No. 7 Div. 366PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This cause is submitted on motion to dismiss the appeal and on the merits.

We think the appeal bond is sufficiently definite that the appeal is from the decree overruling the motion to dissolve the injunction. That is a decree from which an appeal will lie. Section 6081, Code. It is dated January 2, 1936. The appeal bond refers to a decree of that date, which J. B. Adams obtained against J. H. Riddle. There was another decree of that date, but it merely adjudged Riddle in contempt of the injunction, and imposed a fine. This is not a decree in favor of Adams against Riddle, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lynne v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. McLeod v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bowlin v. BowlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Brock v. StimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Ex parte Industrial Finance & Thrift Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Lovelady v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API