Legal Opinion

Robert L. Rust v. Quality Car Corral, Inc. And the Provident Bank

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1980No. 77-3528PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to construe 15 U.S.C. § 1640(e), the statute of limitations applicable to the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. Plaintiff Rust appeals the district court’s dismissal of the action based upon the one-year statute of limitations contained in § 1640(e). We affirm.

On July 1, 1976, plaintiff entered into an installment sale agreement with defendant Quality Car Corral, Inc. Quality Car subsequently assigned its interest in the contract to defendant Provident Bank. On July 1, 1977, Rust filed a complaint in district court. . He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Siegfried Wachtel and Wife, Roberta S. Wachtel v. Bryce West and Wife, Frances WestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. Joint Council Dining Car Employees Local 370 v. Delaware, L. & W. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. Gammons v. Domestic Loans of Winston-Salem, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1976
  4. Bartholomew v. Northampton National Bank of EastonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Souife v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF COMMERCE, NEW ORLEANSDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1978

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Richard M. Jones v. The Transohio Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Robert Hardin v. City Title & Escrow CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor and Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API