Placid Oil Co. v. George
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HARDY, Judge.
Plaintiff provoked this eoncursus proceeding for the purpose of procuring judicial pronouncement as to ■ the rights of the several defendants in and to certain accrued royalties in the sum of $140.31 derived from the production of gas from plaintiff’s well located in Section 36, Township 16 North, Range 7 West, Bienville Parish, Louisiana. The defendants, who are claiming interests in the royalties, as hereinafter more specifically set forth, are Walter L. George, the Oil Investments, Inc., and Polly Davis, joined by her husband, John Davis, Sr.
The defendant, George answered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vincent v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Goldsmith v. McCoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Calcasieu Real Estate & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Union Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bourne v. State Bank of Orlando & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Foxworth Et Ux. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Placid Oil Co. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Brown v. MayfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Roberts v. CooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.