Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Meyer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1970No. 33490PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION

WEIER, Commissioner.

Relator, Deering Milliken, Inc., seeks to make absolute our preliminary writ of prohibition. By such action, respondent judge would be prevented from proceeding further in an action wherein H. S. Gale, Inc., defendant below, seeks relief by counterclaim in a suit brought by relator to register a judgment of the Supreme Court of New York against defendant.

The facts presented by the pleadings and papers in the file illuminate the controversy. Milliken and Gale deal in dry goods. On February 16, 1966, a contract of sale was executed by the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Allen v. YeamanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Siegel v. StrotherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Schoenbacher v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Gibson v. EppsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Green v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  2. Crackerneck Country Club, Inc. v. SprinkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. MossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Grimes v. AppelquistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Lahammer v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API