Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Submitted on briefs April 12, 1894. Decided May 18, 1894. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Long, J..

Plaintiff, doing business under the name of Forrest Bros., commenced suit against the defendant, filing a declaration on the common counts in assumpsit. ¡She filed a bill of particulars, showing dealings between the parties extending oyer a period from July 17, 1891, to some time in January, 1892, amounting to several hundred dollars. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice of set-off and recoujDment. Before the cause came on for trial the parties met together, and settled all their matters of difference except one item of $300. The controversy over this item grows…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Molby v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Pittsburg Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API