Andrew v. Auditor
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
1Opinion of the CourtJelke, J.
1. I am of opinion that the act of the General Assembly of the State of Ohio, entitled, “An act to authorize the Commissioners of Hamilton county, Ohio, to improve Michigan and Shaw avenues, in section 27, Columbia Township,” passed April 13, 1893, 90 O. L. Local, 224, is unconstiutional. State ex rel. v. Commissioners, 54 Ohio St., 333; Grove v. Leidy 9C. C., 272 and 53 Ohio St., 662; Hixon v. Burson, 54 Ohio St., 470 and 483.
2. I find that neither Charles Andrew and others, heirs of Peter Andrew, de*124ceased, William JE. Galloway, Henry Gunk el, Frederick Danner, John S. Youtsey, Laura B.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Platt v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hoyt v. JaquesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Kershaw v. SuppleeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.