Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Hayes v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 23, 2016No. 2015-KH-1789PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Concurrence

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons

|,I agree with the majority’s decision to decline to exercise jurisdiction here, as relator has not established that his guilty plea is invalid. However, I write separately to stress the importance of a district court perfecting the record during a guilty plea colloquy, as “[a] guilty plea must represent a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.” Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). I firmly believe that “[a] dialogue between the court and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Scott A. Fountain, United States of America v. Matthew D. GrangerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. LinearLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. State v. MacKLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
  3. State of Louisiana v. Desmond C. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
  4. State v. BowmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. State v. BowmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API